Amen­de­menten Hazekamp op ontwerp­re­so­lutie over het streven naar een duurzame en concur­re­rende aqua­cultuur in de EU: de weg vooruit


28 september 2022

Motion for a resolution on the striving for a sustainable and competitive EU aquaculture: the way forward.

Amendment 1
Rosa D’Amato, Anja Hazekamp, Alexandra Geese, Alexis Georgoulis, Alice Kuhnke, Alviina Alametsä, Anna Cavazzini, Anna Deparnay‑Grunenberg, Bas Eickhout, Benoît Biteau, Caroline Roose, Ciarán Cuffe, Cornelia Ernst, Damien Carême, Daniel Freund, David Cormand, Eleonora Evi, Erik Marquardt, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Francisco Guerreiro, François Alfonsi, Gwendoline Delbos‑Corfield, Hannah Neumann, Heidi Hautala, Idoia Villanueva Ruiz, Ignazio Corrao, Jakop G. Dalunde, José Gusmão, Jutta Paulus, Karima Delli, Katrin Langensiepen, Kim Van Sparrentak, Kira Marie Peter‑Hansen, Laura Ferrara, Malin Björk, Malte Gallée, Manuela Ripa, Margrete Auken, Maria Arena, Marie Toussaint, Mario Furore, Marisa Matias, Martin Buschmann, Martin Häusling, Michael Bloss, Michèle Rivasi, Mick Wallace, Monika Vana, Mounir Satouri, Niklas Nienaß, Özlem Demirel, Pär Holmgren, Patrick Breyer, Philippe Lamberts, Piernicola Pedicini, Pierrette Herzberger‑Fofana, Reinhard Bütikofer, Sabrina Pignedoli, Sarah Wiener, Saskia Bricmont, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Ska Keller, Terry Reintke, Tilly Metz, Tineke Strik, Tiziana Beghin, Ville Niinistö, Viola von Cramon‑Taubadel, Yannick Jadot, Diana Riba i Giner, Grace O’Sullivan, Leila Chaibi, Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Nora Mebarek, Sylvie Guillaume, Thomas Waitz, Younous Omarjee

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution

Underlines that EU aquaculture meets high standards in terms of product quality and animal health, but that there is still margin for improvement in terms of diversification, competitiveness and environmental performance; notes that low-impact aquaculture (such as low-trophic, multitrophic and organic aquaculture), and environmental services from aquaculture can, if
further developed,
greatly contribute to the European Green Deal, to the farm-to-fork strategy and to a sustainable blue economy17;

Amendment

Underlines that EU aquaculture meets high standards in terms of product quality and animal health, but that there is still margin for improvement in terms of diversification, competitiveness and environmental performance; notes that low-impact aquaculture (such as low-trophic, multitrophic and organic aquaculture), and environmental services from aquaculture must be a priority for further development, if aquaculture is to
greatly contribute to the European Green Deal, to the farm-to-fork strategy and to a sustainable blue economy17;

17 Transforming the EU’s Blue Economy for a Sustainable Future (2021) – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/lega...

17 Transforming the EU’s Blue Economy for a Sustainable Future (2021) – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/lega...


Amendment 2
Rosa D’Amato, Anja Hazekamp, Alexandra Geese, Alexis Georgoulis, Alice Kuhnke, Alviina Alametsä, Anna Cavazzini, Anna Deparnay‑Grunenberg, Bas Eickhout, Benoît Biteau, Caroline Roose, Ciarán Cuffe, Cornelia Ernst, Damien Carême, Daniel Freund, David Cormand, Eleonora Evi, Erik Marquardt, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Francisco Guerreiro, François Alfonsi, Gwendoline Delbos‑Corfield, Hannah Neumann, Heidi Hautala, Idoia Villanueva Ruiz, Ignazio Corrao, Jakop G. Dalunde, José Gusmão, Jutta Paulus, Karima Delli, Katrin Langensiepen, Kim Van Sparrentak, Kira Marie Peter‑Hansen, Laura Ferrara, Malin Björk, Malte Gallée, Manuela Ripa, Margrete Auken, Maria Arena, Marie Toussaint, Mario Furore, Marisa Matias, Martin Buschmann, Martin Häusling, Michael Bloss, Michèle Rivasi, Mick Wallace, Monika Vana, Mounir Satouri, Niklas Nienaß, Özlem Demirel, Pär Holmgren, Patrick Breyer, Philippe Lamberts, Piernicola Pedicini, Pierrette Herzberger‑Fofana, Reinhard Bütikofer, Sabrina Pignedoli, Sarah Wiener, Saskia Bricmont, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Ska Keller, Terry Reintke, Tilly Metz, Tineke Strik, Tiziana Beghin, Ville Niinistö, Viola von Cramon‑Taubadel, Yannick Jadot, Diana Riba i Giner, Grace O’Sullivan, Leila Chaibi, Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Nora Mebarek, Sylvie Guillaume, Thomas Waitz, Younous Omarjee

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution

Stresses that the growth potential of the EU aquaculture sector needs to be developed in a sustainable manner, taking all three pillars of sustainability – economic, social and environmental – into consideration; points out the need to have an attractive and market-oriented sector, also for new fish farmers, with a legal framework for attracting business investments, creating and maintaining good working conditions, and protecting the environment by using sustainable feed sources and improving aquatic health, animal welfare and biosecurity, as well as reducing the use of antimicrobials in accordance with the best available scientific advice, encouraging responsible and prudent practices, in line with the farm to fork strategy;

Amendment

Stresses that the growth potential of the EU aquaculture sector needs to be developed in a sustainable manner, taking all three pillars of sustainability – economic, social and environmental – into consideration; points out the need to have an attractive and market-oriented sector, also for new fish farmers, with a legal framework for attracting business investments, creating and maintaining good working conditions, and protecting the environment by using sustainable feed sources,
while preserving food security also in third countries and improving aquatic health, animal welfare and biosecurity, as well as reducing the use of antimicrobials in accordance with the best available scientific advice, encouraging responsible and prudent practices, in line with the farm to fork strategy;

Amendment 3
Rosa D’Amato, Anja Hazekamp, Alexandra Geese, Alexis Georgoulis, Alice Kuhnke, Alviina Alametsä, Anna Cavazzini, Anna Deparnay‑Grunenberg, Bas Eickhout, Benoît Biteau, Caroline Roose, Ciarán Cuffe, Cornelia Ernst, Damien Carême, Daniel Freund, David Cormand, Eleonora Evi, Erik Marquardt, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Francisco Guerreiro, François Alfonsi, Gwendoline Delbos‑Corfield, Hannah Neumann, Heidi Hautala, Idoia Villanueva Ruiz, Ignazio Corrao, Jakop G. Dalunde, José Gusmão, Jutta Paulus, Karima Delli, Katrin Langensiepen, Kim Van Sparrentak, Kira Marie Peter‑Hansen, Laura Ferrara, Malin Björk, Malte Gallée, Manuela Ripa, Margrete Auken, Maria Arena, Marie Toussaint, Mario Furore, Marisa Matias, Martin Buschmann, Martin Häusling, Michael Bloss, Michèle Rivasi, Mick Wallace, Monika Vana, Mounir Satouri, Niklas Nienaß, Özlem Demirel, Pär Holmgren, Patrick Breyer, Philippe Lamberts, Piernicola Pedicini, Pierrette Herzberger‑Fofana, Reinhard Bütikofer, Sabrina Pignedoli, Sarah Wiener, Saskia Bricmont, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Ska Keller, Terry Reintke, Tilly Metz, Tineke Strik, Tiziana Beghin, Ville Niinistö, Viola von Cramon‑Taubadel, Yannick Jadot, Diana Riba i Giner, Sylwia Spurek

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)

Amendment

19a. Takes the view that new carnivorous species should not be introduced into aquaculture, and that an octopus farming sector should not be allowed to emerge;

Amendment 4
Rosa D’Amato, Anja Hazekamp, Alexandra Geese, Alexis Georgoulis, Alice Kuhnke, Alviina Alametsä, Anna Cavazzini, Anna Deparnay‑Grunenberg, Bas Eickhout, Benoît Biteau, Caroline Roose, Ciarán Cuffe, Cornelia Ernst, Damien Carême, Daniel Freund, David Cormand, Eleonora Evi, Erik Marquardt, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Francisco Guerreiro, François Alfonsi, Gwendoline Delbos‑Corfield, Hannah Neumann, Heidi Hautala, Idoia Villanueva Ruiz, Ignazio Corrao, Jakop G. Dalunde, José Gusmão, Jutta Paulus, Karima Delli, Katrin Langensiepen, Kim Van Sparrentak, Kira Marie Peter‑Hansen, Laura Ferrara, Malin Björk, Malte Gallée, Manuela Ripa, Margrete Auken, Maria Arena, Marie Toussaint, Mario Furore, Marisa Matias, Martin Buschmann, Martin Häusling, Michael Bloss, Michèle Rivasi, Mick Wallace, Monika Vana, Mounir Satouri, Niklas Nienaß, Özlem Demirel, Pär Holmgren, Patrick Breyer, Philippe Lamberts, Piernicola Pedicini, Pierrette Herzberger‑Fofana, Reinhard Bütikofer, Sabrina Pignedoli, Sarah Wiener, Saskia Bricmont, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Ska Keller, Terry Reintke, Tilly Metz, Tineke Strik, Tiziana Beghin, Ville Niinistö, Viola von Cramon‑Taubadel, Yannick Jadot, Grace O’Sullivan, Leila Chaibi, Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Thomas Waitz, Younous Omarjee

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution

24. Reiterates that various recommendations on animal welfare do not apply to the fisheries and aquaculture sectors because of their nature;

Amendment

deleted

Amendment 5
Rosa D’Amato, Anja Hazekamp, Alexandra Geese, Alexis Georgoulis, Alice Kuhnke, Alviina Alametsä, Anna Cavazzini, Anna Deparnay‑Grunenberg, Bas Eickhout, Benoît Biteau, Caroline Roose, Ciarán Cuffe, Cornelia Ernst, Damien Carême, Daniel Freund, David Cormand, Eleonora Evi, Erik Marquardt, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Francisco Guerreiro, François Alfonsi, Gwendoline Delbos‑Corfield, Hannah Neumann, Heidi Hautala, Idoia Villanueva Ruiz, Ignazio Corrao, Jakop G. Dalunde, José Gusmão, Jutta Paulus, Karima Delli, Katrin Langensiepen, Kim Van Sparrentak, Kira Marie Peter‑Hansen, Laura Ferrara, Malin Björk, Malte Gallée, Manuela Ripa, Margrete Auken, Maria Arena, Marie Toussaint, Mario Furore, Marisa Matias, Martin Buschmann, Martin Häusling, Michael Bloss, Michèle Rivasi, Mick Wallace, Monika Vana, Mounir Satouri, Niklas Nienaß, Özlem Demirel, Pär Holmgren, Patrick Breyer, Philippe Lamberts, Piernicola Pedicini, Pierrette Herzberger‑Fofana, Reinhard Bütikofer, Sabrina Pignedoli, Sarah Wiener, Saskia Bricmont, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Ska Keller, Terry Reintke, Tilly Metz, Tineke Strik, Tiziana Beghin, Ville Niinistö, Viola von Cramon‑Taubadel, Yannick Jadot, Diana Riba i Giner, Grace O’Sullivan, Marc Botenga, Thomas Waitz, Younous Omarjee

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37

Motion for a resolution

Stresses the importance of sustainable feed ingredients for aquaculture in the Union; considers that aquaculture can only fill the fish gap if all species farmed provide a net gain in fish protein, meaning that aquaculture does not remove more wild fish from the oceans and other bodies of water for feed requirements than it produces; highlights that globally, a large share of fish used to produce fishmeal and fish oil is caught in the exclusive economic zones of developing countries; stresses the need to promote ecologically sustainable marine proteins and oils to be used as feed in the form of by-products and trimmings, other proteins and innovative solutions, such as insect meal and microalgae, and the partial replacement of marine proteins and oils with non-marine alternatives that are sustainably produced; calls on the Commission and the Member States to invest in research and innovation in order to promote a transition to sustainable and new sources of protein and asks the Commission to assess whether any legislative changes are needed in this regard; calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote sustainable practices and increase the percentage of independently certified fishmeal and fish oil within feeds, with certification carried out by credible and independent environmental and social certification schemes that use low trophic index assessment criteria and the FAO code of conduct;

Amendment

Stresses the importance of sustainable feed ingredients for aquaculture in the Union; considers that aquaculture can only fill the fish gap if all species farmed provide a net gain in fish protein, meaning that aquaculture does not remove more wild fish from the oceans and other bodies of water for feed requirements than it produces; highlights that globally, a large share of fish used to produce fishmeal and fish oil is caught in the exclusive economic zones of developing countries, which has potentially negative consequences for their food security and fisheries sectors; stresses the need to promote ecologically sustainable marine proteins and oils to be used as feed in the form of by-products and trimmings, other proteins and innovative solutions, such as insect meal and microalgae, and the partial replacement of marine proteins and oils with non-marine alternatives that are sustainably produced; calls on the Commission and the Member States to invest in research and innovation in order to promote a transition to sustainable and new sources of protein and asks the Commission to assess whether any legislative changes are needed in this regard; calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote sustainable practices and increase the percentage of independently certified fishmeal and fish oil within feeds, with certification carried out by credible and independent environmental and social certification schemes that use low trophic index assessment criteria and the FAO code of conduct;

Amendment 6
Rosa D’Amato, Anja Hazekamp, Alexandra Geese, Alexis Georgoulis, Alice Kuhnke, Alviina Alametsä, Anna Cavazzini, Anna Deparnay‑Grunenberg, Bas Eickhout, Benoît Biteau, Caroline Roose, Ciarán Cuffe, Cornelia Ernst, Damien Carême, Daniel Freund, David Cormand, Eleonora Evi, Erik Marquardt, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Francisco Guerreiro, François Alfonsi, Gwendoline Delbos‑Corfield, Hannah Neumann, Heidi Hautala, Idoia Villanueva Ruiz, Ignazio Corrao, Jakop G. Dalunde, José Gusmão, Jutta Paulus, Karima Delli, Katrin Langensiepen, Kim Van Sparrentak, Kira Marie Peter‑Hansen, Laura Ferrara, Malin Björk, Malte Gallée, Manuela Ripa, Margrete Auken, Maria Arena, Marie Toussaint, Mario Furore, Marisa Matias, Martin Buschmann, Martin Häusling, Michael Bloss, Michèle Rivasi, Mick Wallace, Monika Vana, Mounir Satouri, Niklas Nienaß, Özlem Demirel, Pär Holmgren, Patrick Breyer, Philippe Lamberts, Piernicola Pedicini, Pierrette Herzberger‑Fofana, Reinhard Bütikofer, Sabrina Pignedoli, Sarah Wiener, Saskia Bricmont, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Ska Keller, Terry Reintke, Tilly Metz, Tineke Strik, Tiziana Beghin, Ville Niinistö, Viola von Cramon‑Taubadel, Yannick Jadot, Diana Riba i Giner, Grace O’Sullivan, Leila Chaibi, Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Nora Mebarek, Sylvie Guillaume, Thomas Waitz, Younous Omarjee

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50

Motion for a resolution

Calls on the Commission to work further on levelling the playing field for EU aquaculture vis-a-vis third country producers through the revision of international trade agreements and the possible signing of new ones in the future, in relation to imports of products that do not have the same market access, environmental and social sustainability, or fish welfare standards as those produced in the EU, including by updating rules for the better implementation of aquatic food labelling; considers that, in specific cases such as caviar labelling, the legal framework on information for consumers should be revised; calls on the Commission to analyse, by means of an impact assessment, the inclusion of sustainable aquaculture sectors in the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism in order to create incentives for European industries and EU trade partners to decarbonise their industries in favour of implementing
measures that will positively help to reduce greenhouse gases with the aim of reaching zero net emissions, and therefore supporting both EU and global climate policies towards greenhouse gas neutrality, and at the same time, without being discriminatory or constituting a disguised restriction on international trade;

Amendment

Calls on the Commission to work further on levelling the playing field for EU aquaculture vis-a-vis third country producers through the revision of international trade agreements and the possible signing of new ones in the future, in relation to imports of products that do not have the same market access, environmental and social sustainability, or fish welfare standards as those produced in the EU, including by updating rules for the better implementation of aquatic food labelling; considers that, in specific cases such as caviar labelling, the legal framework on information for consumers should be revised; calls on the Commission to analyse, by means of an impact assessment, ways to ensure that European industries and EU trade partners decarbonise their industries and put in place measures that will positively help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in line with the Paris Agreement, thereby supporting both EU and global climate policies towards greenhouse gas neutrality, and at the same time, without being discriminatory or constituting a disguised restriction on international trade;

Amendment 7
Rosa D’Amato, Anja Hazekamp, Alexandra Geese, Alexis Georgoulis, Alice Kuhnke, Alviina Alametsä, Anna Cavazzini, Anna Deparnay‑Grunenberg, Bas Eickhout, Benoît Biteau, Caroline Roose, Ciarán Cuffe, Cornelia Ernst, Damien Carême, Daniel Freund, David Cormand, Eleonora Evi, Erik Marquardt, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Francisco Guerreiro, François Alfonsi, Gwendoline Delbos‑Corfield, Hannah Neumann, Heidi Hautala, Idoia Villanueva Ruiz, Ignazio Corrao, Jakop G. Dalunde, José Gusmão, Jutta Paulus, Karima Delli, Katrin Langensiepen, Kim Van Sparrentak, Kira Marie Peter‑Hansen, Laura Ferrara, Malin Björk, Malte Gallée, Manuela Ripa, Margrete Auken, Maria Arena, Marie Toussaint, Mario Furore, Marisa Matias, Martin Buschmann, Martin Häusling, Michael Bloss, Michèle Rivasi, Mick Wallace, Monika Vana, Mounir Satouri, Niklas Nienaß, Özlem Demirel, Pär Holmgren, Patrick Breyer, Philippe Lamberts, Piernicola Pedicini, Pierrette Herzberger‑Fofana, Reinhard Bütikofer, Sabrina Pignedoli, Sarah Wiener, Saskia Bricmont, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Ska Keller, Terry Reintke, Tilly Metz, Tineke Strik, Tiziana Beghin, Ville Niinistö, Viola von Cramon‑Taubadel, Yannick Jadot, Diana Riba i Giner, Grace O’Sullivan, Leila Chaibi, Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Nora Mebarek, Sylvie Guillaume, Thomas Waitz, Younous Omarjee

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50

Motion for a resolution

Calls on the Commission to prepare a proposal for an EU great cormorant management plan that could properly and definitively address the problem the aquaculture sector has been facing for many years, based on the best available scientific advice and experiences and practices already tested in Member States; urges that the plan be designed for the effective mitigation and control of their effect on aquaculture farms, with a view to reducing their economic, environmental and social impact on production and biodiversity; highlights that the plan should include a list of eligible measures on preventive coexistence solutions and adequate compensation for losses and measures, financed with EU or national funds; insists that financial support for tailor-made research aimed at finding and testing preventive measures is key, but also for allowing proper monitoring, including recording and analysing the effects of the measures undertaken; calls on the Member States to implement those measures on a local case-by-case basis and report to the Commission every year on the implementation of the plan, including the effectiveness of the measures chosen; calls on the Commission to evaluate the EU great cormorant management plan every five years and report to Parliament; urges the Commission to prepare, as an immediate action, a guidance document on how to apply derogations provided for in Article 9 of the Birds Directive, and to assess the need to modify the current legislation where preventive measures have proven insufficient and the financial and social impact does not allow for coexistence solutions, according to the best scientific advice;

Amendment

56. Calls on the Commission to promote effective solutions within the existing legal framework for potential conflicts between cormorants and fisheries and aquaculture so as to address the problem the sectors have been facing for many years, based on the best available scientific advice and experiences and practices already tested in Member States, in order to prevent and reduce the economic impact of cormorants on fisheries and aquaculture production, and to monitor the effectiveness of the measures taken; highlights the importance of measures on preventive coexistence solutions and adequate compensation for losses and measures, financed with EU or national funds, such as the EMFAF; insists that financial support for tailor-made research aimed at finding and testing preventive measures is key, but also for allowing proper monitoring, including recording and analysing the effects of the measures undertaken; calls on the Member States to implement those measures on a local case-by-case basis and report to the Commission every year on the implementation and effectiveness of the measures; urges the Member States to follow the 2008 guidance document on how to apply derogations provided for in Article 9 of the Birds Directive, and to support further research to improve the efficiency of existing measures and develop and test additional methods in line with the Birds Directive to minimise damage, where existing measures have proven insufficient;


Status

Ingediend

Voor

Tegen

Lees onze andere moties

Amendementen Hazekamp op ontwerpresolutie over het streven naar een duurzame en concurrerende aquacultuur in de EU: de weg vooruit

Lees verder

Amendementen Hazekamp over de voorstellen van het Europees Parlement tot wijziging van de verdragen

Lees verder

Word lid

    Learn More Doneer